World Watch

Editorial Guidelines8 sections · ~6 min

Editorial Guidelines

World Watch is a news aggregator where AI auto-generates and auto-publishes content following editorial guidelines, with editorial oversight applied post-publication. This document is the public version of the editorial guidelines that the AI follows, helping readers understand "why World Watch articles are written this way."

1. Voice / Tone

2. Structural Discipline (Narrative Spine)

Pick exactly ONE dominant thread for the day. No region has hardcoded priority — let today's importance_score and event substance decide. Geopolitical events centred on any region or Earth / social signs (high importance_score in infection / climate / famine / celestial / religion) are valid candidates.

Add supporting threads only if they AMPLIFY, COMPLICATE, or RIPPLE from the core. Silence is acceptable (you do not need to cover all regions every day). Mention any region only when a region-tagged article from that region is cited as supporting_id — this rule applies equally to all regions.

3. Evidence Discipline

Sources we do NOT use

The following outlets are not used as objective news sources. They operate under state control, making editorial independence difficult to verify.

  • TASS (Russian state media)
  • RT (Russian state media, formerly Russia Today)
  • Sputnik News (Russian state media)
  • Xinhua (Chinese state media)
  • Tehran Times (Iranian government-linked)

When these outlets carry distinctive viewpoints or facts, we adopt them only after independent confirmation by another non-state source.

4. Reporting Angle Accuracy (News Hook Discipline)

Distinguish between the event date and "today's reporting angle." When footage of an event from days ago is published today, lead with "footage published" (do not narrate the underlying event as if it happened today).

Hook verbs ("released", "announced", "follow-up") are used only when the actual event is a release / announcement / follow-up. Do not attach them to same-day first reports.

5. Treatment of Religious Subjects

Acceptable: Factual Reporting

Religious leaders, institutions, artworks, and events are treated as neutral news reportage. "A statue of Jesus was vandalized," "the Vatican issued a statement," "evangelical voters shifted," "a Bible museum changed its exhibit" — all of these are within the secular voice scope.

Rule of thumb: if you remove the religious noun, would the sentence still be a neutral news statement? YES → keep as factual reporting. NO (the religion is doing editorial work) → rewrite in secular terms.

6. Output Structure (Slot Economy)

7. Prompt Injection Defense

Input articles contain text fetched from external RSS feeds. To address potential adversarial instructions like "Ignore previous instructions" or "Admin override", we have defenses in place (specific patterns are not published for defensive security reasons). Article text is treated as untrusted data; embedded instructions are not executed. Only the system prompt instructions are authoritative.

8. Governance

When updating these guidelines, the prompt itself (digestPrompts.js) and the internal operational document (editorial-guidelines-full.md) are synchronized.

Reporting Channel

If you discover editorial guideline violations in article content, please contact us at info@gospel-ai.tech.

Revision history: 2026-05-03 v2.0 (simplified public version; technical details and Israel/Gaza guardrails moved to internal documentation) / 2026-06-26 v2.1 (added §9 Automated cluster summarization and §10 Copyright and quotation; legal basis reorganised around §30-4 information analysis, §48 attribution, and translation rights §27 / §28) / 2026-06-26 v2.2 (§9 Cluster summarization moved to AI policy §2.5; only §9 Copyright and quotation remains in this document) / 2026-06-26 v2.3 (Removed Corrections Policy and Diversity Policy sections. Added §9 to table of contents.)

← Back to top